Handling post-approval changes (PACs) can be challenging. There are different timelines and submission rules, and on top of that, optimizing your processes can be difficult.
That's why having a clear post-approval change management (PACM) protocol to guarantee regulatory approval is so important. In this blog post, we’ll discuss the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Q12 guideline and the tools you can use to accelerate PAC approval.
The origin of PACM can be traced back to the introduction of Quality by Design (QbD) principles in product development and manufacturing. Specifically, this evolution can be attributed to a set of established IHC guidelines: Q8, Q9, Q10, and Q11.
It's worth noting that these guidelines did not provide extensive clarity on how to incorporate the principles of product lifecycle management. There was a lack of a harmonized approach to technical and regulatory considerations for lifecycle management to materialize a vision of post-approval “operational flexibility” during the commercial phase.
Recognizing this gap in the regulatory landscape, the IHC took action in 2017 by releasing a new guideline titled Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management, commonly referred to as ICH Q12.
Distinct in its focus, ICH Q12 delves into various facets of the pharmaceutical landscape, encompassing a wide array of domains such as biologics, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), and even drug-device combinations.
ICH Q12 encompasses a set of five invaluable tools that not only facilitate agile lifecycle management but also exert a positive influence on both industry practices and regulatory oversight. The tools are the following:
The ICH Q12 guideline introduces a clear definition of “Established Conditions” (ECs), which are the elements in the submission that “are considered necessary to assure product quality and therefore would require a regulatory submission if changed post-approval.” These result from development efforts and are reflected in an appropriate control strategy (critical process parameters, critical material attributes, elements of analytical procedures, etc.).
In essence, a significant part of this guideline revolves around tools that enable a streamlined approach to implementing changes throughout the product lifecycle.
Implementing a PACM protocol has many advantages, such as:
Making post-approval changes can be difficult due to varying timelines and submission requirements and process optimization challenges. Therefore, knowing how to create a PACM protocol is critical. To make it easier, we’ve created a step-by-step guide that outlines how to do it.
In the process of developing a PACM protocol, a quality risk management (QRM) platform grounded in the principles outlined in ICH Q9 (R1) can play a pivotal role in streamlining and enhancing the overall process. The effective use of QRM and knowledge management in your product will create the necessary transparency through a risk- and science-based rationale to justify what chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) elements should be established conditions, making the regulatory approval smoother.
A robust QRM platform will open a wide array of opportunities toward this goal, such as: