An important, and sometimes challenging, step in every product lifecycle is the point when it gets its premarket or a postmarket regulatory approval by a regulator. Luckily, through a combination of good practices for Benefit-Risk Assessment and technology, this has become much easier.
Let’s see how!
A key element of every premarket or postmarket regulatory approval concerns the evaluation of the drug’s benefits, risks and risk management options and how do they factor into the regulatory decision.
If you want to market a new drug, the regulatory agency will have to clear it as safe and effective under prescribed conditions, recommended or suggested in the product’s labelling.
Demonstrating effectiveness requires solid evidence. On the other hand, since all drugs can have negative effects, it’s necessary to show that the benefits outweigh the risks.
These benefit-risk assessments look into extensive evidence of safety and effectiveness as well as other factors like the severity of the condition that the drug treats or prevents.
The regulator’s risk assessment takes into account several points.
It typically considers:
FDA does this consideration using a Benefit-Risk framework for new drug review. This framework consists of the following points:
When it comes to premarket drugs and biologics, uncertainty is typically higher. However, many of those sources can be anticipated and avoided using the framework:
When making the Marketing Application, it becomes then important to state key risks and benefits. We’ll tell you more about how to optimize these risks analysis soon!
Benefit-risk assessment does not end with the regulator’s approval of a drug. The end-to-end lifecycle approach is key to a drug’s benefit-risk assessment since our knowledge of it changes with time.
When a drug which is already being marketed requires a re-examination of its benefit-risk profile, the regulator may conduct a new assessment.
These assessments can be triggered by:
The regulator then conducts the benefit-risk assessment using the Benefit-Risk Framework. Typical outcomes from these assessments include:
The regulator will consider the strength of the evidence and the remaining uncertainties about the drug’s benefits and risks.
Benefit-risk assessments involve qualitative, subjective judgments. This judgement weighs data
and information about the drug’s risks and uncertainties within their therapeutic and regulatory context.
In order to collect this data, drug makers sometimes use non-specialized tools, like spreadsheets for example.
But this can bring several challenges such as:
We recommend the departure from this routine where compliance ends up depending on more variables than it should.
Improving Risk Assessment performance requires a unified platform that supports the following functions:
Digitalisation will support your decision-making providing you an understanding of the risks each choice brings.
At ValGenesis we use a systematic approach designed to simplify the QRM process, automate and optimize, and then digitally integrate your process. Discover more about our solutions on the topic.